Former ANC Commissioner Chris Fromboluti posted the following on the Chevy Chase Listerv:
Dear ANC Commissioner Henry Griffin:
Recently I returned from a short vacation to find that Kanawha Street had been made one way Eastbound between Connecticut Avenue and 38th Street NW. I have polled a number of neighbors and residents of the affected block and all are annoyed at the change and none had been notified nor informed that this change was in the works.
This new traffic pattern is very inconvenient for all who live in the immediate area. It means that residents can no longer turn onto Kanawha from Connecticut but have to take a roundabout route to get to their destination. This in turn adds traffic to the streets that we now have to detour through. It just doesn't make any sense.
Per my experience as a former Commissioner, any change to street configuration is always vetted with the affected neighborhood to gauge citizen reaction before it is enacted. Were you or the ANC aware of this action? If yes we would appreciate knowing why no-one was notified in advance. If, as I suspect, you knew nothing about this I would appreciate an investigation into this very irregular procedure.
So if this is correct, DDOT, possibly in conjunction or advice and consent of ANC 3/4G Commissioners, has altered the configuration of a street in the grid in upper Northwest to be one-way, causing residents to significantly alter their driving patterns adding unnecessary traffic to adjacent streets. This appears to be without any notice to the community for discussion. To wit, a quick search of the ANC 3/4 G website suggests nary an agenda item or minutes indicating any sort of public notice.
Rumors in the community are that the local Single Member District Commissioner was fully aware and advocating for this change.
Seriously, how does this happen without a peep to the broader community? What happens if or when other residents or ANC Commissioners decide they want significant changes to their streets? What is the process for making a street one-way? Was Councilmember Cheh's office aware of this?
Inquiring minds would like to know.
Ongoing news and commentary about the happenings in Upper Northwest Washington, DC, including American University Park, Chevy Chase, Cleveland Park, Friendship Heights, Foxhall, Glover Park, Palisades, Spring Valley, Tenleytown and Woodley Park.
Monday, August 29, 2011
Thursday, August 25, 2011
Another Giant Redux
And, like so many times before, the Wisconsin Avenue Giant has been delayed once again.
Courtesy: DC Metro Urban Diary
Courtesy: DC Metro Urban Diary
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
AU Tenley Law School Update
As posted on the Tenleytown Listserv:
We would like to host a meeting of the AU Campus Plan Task Force at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, Aug. 30 in Mary Graydon #4 on the AU campus.
The purpose is to present parts of the Campus Plan that have evolved in recent weeks and which we either have filed or will be filing with the D.C. Zoning Commission. This includes project details for the North Hall student residence adjacent to the President's Office and plans for the Washington College of Law on the Tenley Campus.
The North Hall plans are now posted on the AU Campus Plan Web site, and the law school/Tenley Campus plans will be posted prior to the Aug. 30 meeting.
We hope that you can attend the meeting on Aug. 30 for an update and discussion.
Thank you.
David Taylor
President's Chief of Staff
We would like to host a meeting of the AU Campus Plan Task Force at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, Aug. 30 in Mary Graydon #4 on the AU campus.
The purpose is to present parts of the Campus Plan that have evolved in recent weeks and which we either have filed or will be filing with the D.C. Zoning Commission. This includes project details for the North Hall student residence adjacent to the President's Office and plans for the Washington College of Law on the Tenley Campus.
The North Hall plans are now posted on the AU Campus Plan Web site, and the law school/Tenley Campus plans will be posted prior to the Aug. 30 meeting.
We hope that you can attend the meeting on Aug. 30 for an update and discussion.
Thank you.
David Taylor
President's Chief of Staff
Tuesday, August 09, 2011
A New Middle School in Palisades?
The Examiner covers the prospects of a new Junior High School in Palisades, as proposed by Mary Cheh.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
DDOT Announces Capital Bikeshare Expansion
DDOT has announced the addition of two Bikeshare stations in Ward 3:
3000 Connecticut. NW – National Zoo
Calvert Street and 39th Street, NW (Stoddert Recreation Center)
In addition, DDOT will expand the station at Calvert Street and Woodley Place in Woodley Park.
3000 Connecticut. NW – National Zoo
Calvert Street and 39th Street, NW (Stoddert Recreation Center)
In addition, DDOT will expand the station at Calvert Street and Woodley Place in Woodley Park.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Fare thee Well 4P's?
The Prince of Petworth confirms rumors that 4P's Irish Pub in Cleveland Park is set to be re-branded as McFadden's, a companion to the Foggy Bottom pub.
Chevy Chase Park Meeting
Rhere will be a community meeting tonight (7/26) at 6:30PM with DPR regarding Livingston Street Park. During this meeting DPR will review the additions to the park, areas that need attention, and the timeline for repairs or remaining installations (spray park, sand box, benches, etc.).
Who: DPR Staff, Director Aguirre, CM Mary Cheh and Community
When: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:30 PM
Where: Chevy Chase Community Center Multi-Purpose Room
5601 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Who: DPR Staff, Director Aguirre, CM Mary Cheh and Community
When: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:30 PM
Where: Chevy Chase Community Center Multi-Purpose Room
5601 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
AU Campsu Plan: East Campus
One person's perspective on the East Campus Plan from American University. One commenter has shared an early campus plan from 1899.
Thursday, July 14, 2011
New Proposal for Babes in Tenleytown
DC Metro Urban Diary provides and update for the Babes Billiard site at Wisconsin and Brandywine Street in the heart of Tenleytown. According to the article, the property owner will now seek a 6 story structure via the PUD process.
Monday, July 11, 2011
Woodley Park McMansions
Lydia DePillis updates the new houses at Garfield and 29th Place in Woodley Park.
Wednesday, July 06, 2011
NW Current: Threat of razing sparks outcry on Jocelyn
The July 6, 2011 edition of the NW Current has an article entitled "Threat of razing sparks outcry on Jocelyn". The Brady Holt piece describes the efforts of residents in the vicinity of 3901 Jocelyn Street who are opposing the raze permit submitted by developers earlier this summer upon purchasing the 10,000+ lot and house.
Recall the effort in 2007 by Historic Chevy Chase DC to create a historic district in anticipation of the neighborhood centennial. The effort proved to be too controversial and the application was never formally submitted to the Historic Preservation Office.
During the debate, one Historic District supporter suggested or better, warned about a coming "tipping point" in local neighborhood economics:
Rampant teardowns are triggered when a neighborhood reaches a tipping point on land economics. In our neighborhood (20015), the average price for an existing home is about $900,000. As a developer, I have calculated that when a homebuilder can reasonably expect to get about $1,800,000 for a new McMansion, he could afford to pay $900,000 for an existing historic house as if it were a vacant, buildable lot. As recent sale prices on the upper end demonstrate, we are getting dangerously close to this tipping point. And once we hit the tipping point, there is no going back, as has been seen by the rapid demolition of homes in places like residential Bethesda. It is worth setting up protections now, before we reach that point, rather than trying to fix it retroactively.
Given the number of new houses and teardowns on Jenifer Street, Nevada Avenue and Tennyson Street, these words from 2007 seem more prescient than ever.
Recall the effort in 2007 by Historic Chevy Chase DC to create a historic district in anticipation of the neighborhood centennial. The effort proved to be too controversial and the application was never formally submitted to the Historic Preservation Office.
During the debate, one Historic District supporter suggested or better, warned about a coming "tipping point" in local neighborhood economics:
Rampant teardowns are triggered when a neighborhood reaches a tipping point on land economics. In our neighborhood (20015), the average price for an existing home is about $900,000. As a developer, I have calculated that when a homebuilder can reasonably expect to get about $1,800,000 for a new McMansion, he could afford to pay $900,000 for an existing historic house as if it were a vacant, buildable lot. As recent sale prices on the upper end demonstrate, we are getting dangerously close to this tipping point. And once we hit the tipping point, there is no going back, as has been seen by the rapid demolition of homes in places like residential Bethesda. It is worth setting up protections now, before we reach that point, rather than trying to fix it retroactively.
Given the number of new houses and teardowns on Jenifer Street, Nevada Avenue and Tennyson Street, these words from 2007 seem more prescient than ever.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Zoning Commission Approves UDC Plan
The Zoning Commission has approved the UDC Campus Plan (case 11-02) and construction of a new LEED Platinum student center. This will be a major step forward for the University Campus and the Van Ness area.
Next up? American University.
Next up? American University.
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Welcome Back, Woodley Park
In a stunning reversal, the City Council approved a late amendment to the Redistricting Bill bringing precinct 136 back to Ward 3. The area, generally east of Connecticut Avenue between Devonshire Place and Calvert Street had been in Ward 1.
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
More on the Cleveland Park Service Lane
The petition for the removal of the service lane in Cleveland Park is drawing attention from The City Paper and GreaterGreaterWashington (see comments).
What are your thoughts?
What are your thoughts?
Labels:
Cleveland Park,
Pedestrian Safety,
Transportation
Monday, June 13, 2011
City Paper: Ft. Reno Schedule
The City Paper has provided the early schedule for the Ft. Reno concert series.
Thursday, June 09, 2011
Service Lane in Cleveland Park
A petition was posted on the Cleveland Park Listserv recently in response to discussion regarding the "service lane" on the east side of Connecticut Avenue between Macomb and Newark Streets in Cleveland Park.
The lane was created during the early "automobile era" when planners assumed that the provision of auto facilities would create a business-friendly environment. Cleveland Park is home to an early example of the auto-centric strip mall.
Petition organizers suggest that restoring the broad sidewalk will enhance the pedestrian experience, provide more lively streetscape in the form of outdoor seating for restaurants and enable the many neighborhood visitors to enjoy the commercial strip without being crammed into a pedestrian facility that is at many times of the day inadequate for demand.
Opponents suggest the retail and service businesses along the strip would not be able to survive without the necessary parking, or in the alternative, that a reconfiguration would push more vehicles into the residential areas.
What do you think?
The lane was created during the early "automobile era" when planners assumed that the provision of auto facilities would create a business-friendly environment. Cleveland Park is home to an early example of the auto-centric strip mall.
Petition organizers suggest that restoring the broad sidewalk will enhance the pedestrian experience, provide more lively streetscape in the form of outdoor seating for restaurants and enable the many neighborhood visitors to enjoy the commercial strip without being crammed into a pedestrian facility that is at many times of the day inadequate for demand.
Opponents suggest the retail and service businesses along the strip would not be able to survive without the necessary parking, or in the alternative, that a reconfiguration would push more vehicles into the residential areas.
What do you think?
Wednesday, June 08, 2011
Municipal Bonds and Ward 3
A resident has shared a correspondence from Mary Cheh on the passage of a tax on Municipal Bonds. As the Councilmember notes, this retroactive action affects seniors living on fixed incomes and ward 3 residents disproportionately:
I’m sorry, I am reading your emails, but I’ve been inundated of late, as you might imagine. I was opposed to this tax but accepted it because (1) we are now the only jurisdiction to offer an exemption on out-of-state bonds and, contrary to the past, the District offers a wider array of its own tax-exempt bonds, and (2) it was linked to a promise that the extra revenues we anticipate in the balance of this year would be used to eliminate the retroactive effect, thereby grandfathering in bonds purchased before October 2011.
Regrettably, Councilmember Tommy Wells and others introduced an amendment that took away the promise to grandfather the tax exemption and instead use future revenues to pay for other programs. And, in an instance of rank politics, that group of Councilmembers secured their necessary seventh vote for the amendment from Councilmember Vincent Orange by promising him that he could use a half-a-million dollars of the expected revenues for the Lincoln Theater and Emancipation Day Festivities. I think that that action was unprincipled and unraveled an arrangement that was previously fair.
There is also an underlying issue of fairness here. In tax year 2008, there were 19,917 taxpayers that had reported some tax-exempt interest. Of those, 70% lived in Ward 3. There are many retired people--a great many of them in Ward 3--who rely on the interest of these bonds as part of their retirement plans. I have spoken to Chairman Brown and impressed upon him the urgency of having that amendment reconsidered, and he tells me he is attempting to do that for the second and final vote. So we'll see.
Given the state of the Council and Government leadership at this time, this hardly feels like a fair action to those who have saved, rather than those who are squandering city resources on pet projects or for private gain. Perhaps the Council and Executive Branch ought to ensure the financial house and safety systems on taxpayer monies are sound before burdening District Seniors with a retroactive tax.
I’m sorry, I am reading your emails, but I’ve been inundated of late, as you might imagine. I was opposed to this tax but accepted it because (1) we are now the only jurisdiction to offer an exemption on out-of-state bonds and, contrary to the past, the District offers a wider array of its own tax-exempt bonds, and (2) it was linked to a promise that the extra revenues we anticipate in the balance of this year would be used to eliminate the retroactive effect, thereby grandfathering in bonds purchased before October 2011.
Regrettably, Councilmember Tommy Wells and others introduced an amendment that took away the promise to grandfather the tax exemption and instead use future revenues to pay for other programs. And, in an instance of rank politics, that group of Councilmembers secured their necessary seventh vote for the amendment from Councilmember Vincent Orange by promising him that he could use a half-a-million dollars of the expected revenues for the Lincoln Theater and Emancipation Day Festivities. I think that that action was unprincipled and unraveled an arrangement that was previously fair.
There is also an underlying issue of fairness here. In tax year 2008, there were 19,917 taxpayers that had reported some tax-exempt interest. Of those, 70% lived in Ward 3. There are many retired people--a great many of them in Ward 3--who rely on the interest of these bonds as part of their retirement plans. I have spoken to Chairman Brown and impressed upon him the urgency of having that amendment reconsidered, and he tells me he is attempting to do that for the second and final vote. So we'll see.
Given the state of the Council and Government leadership at this time, this hardly feels like a fair action to those who have saved, rather than those who are squandering city resources on pet projects or for private gain. Perhaps the Council and Executive Branch ought to ensure the financial house and safety systems on taxpayer monies are sound before burdening District Seniors with a retroactive tax.
Tuesday, June 07, 2011
Monday, June 06, 2011
Ward 3 Schools Vie for Baseball Title
Congratulations to Sidwell Friends for capturing the Congressional Bank DC Baseball classic after edging St. Albans, Maret and Wilson en route to victory.
Wilson High School should also be congratulated for taking its 19th DCIAA Baseball Trophy.
Wilson High School should also be congratulated for taking its 19th DCIAA Baseball Trophy.
Monday, May 30, 2011
Post: Ward 3 Flower Thief on the Loose
Lori Aratani of the Washington Post reports on the wily flower bandit of Ward 3.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)